Hooded Warbler
Ecoregional Scale Conservation Planning
spacer
 
   


Made possible through a partnership with the National Wetlands Research Center


Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris )
Status:
The painted bunting occurs in two allopatric populations that may represent separate species (Lowther and others 1999). The western population occurs in the southern Great Plains and the western edges of the CH and WGCP, while the eastern population occurs along the Coastal Plain from North Carolina to Florida. Populations have been relatively stable across the WGCP as a whole Table 005 (Table 005) . However, within this region, populations have declined in Arkansas (5.8 percent per year from 1967-2004), Louisiana (3.5 percent), and Texas (2.4 percent) but increased in Oklahoma (1.3 percent). The painted bunting is not a USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern but is a PIF Tier 1 priority in both BCRs Table 001 (Table 001) .
pabu
Relative abundance of Painted Bunting, derived from Breeding Bird Survey data, 1994 - 2003.
 
image courtesy of www.whatbird.com
 

Natural History:

The habitat requirements of the painted bunting are poorly understood. The species is generally found in areas of scattered woody vegetation. Kopachena and Crist (2000a) characterize painted bunting habitat in northeast Texas as “wooded areas in otherwise open habitat” as opposed to indigo buntings which occur in “open areas in otherwise wooded habitat.” Painted buntings utilize smaller, more heterogeneous groups of trees than indigo buntings, but microhabitats differ little between the species (Kopachena and Crist 2000b). Painted buntings occur in narrow riparian strips in eastern Texas and their abundance decreases quickly as widths exceed 70 m (Conner and others 2004).

Nests are constructed in low, woody vegetation (Lowther and others 1999), and territory size varies with population density. In Missouri, territories ranged 0.64–6.66 ha and included 80 percent pasture and 20 percent woodland. This species is a common host of both brown-headed and bronzed cowbirds.

Model Description:

The habitat suitability model for the painted bunting contains six parameters:

  • landform
  • landcover
  • successional age class
  • distance to edge
  • interspersion of open and forested lands
  • small (<2.5 cm d.b.h.) stem density

The first suitability function combines landform, landcover, and successional age class into a single matrix (SI1) that defines unique combinations of these classes Table 099 (Table 099) . We directly assigned suitability index scores to these combinations based on relative habitat rankings for vegetation and successional age class associations of painted buntings reported in Hamel (1992). We assigned shrub-seedling age classes higher values than Hamel (1992) based on qualitative descriptions in Lowther and others (1999).

Painted buntings are an early-successional species associated with edges. We used data on territory density from Lanyon and Thompson (1986; Table 100 Table 100) to define an inverse logistic function linking suitability index scores to distance from an edge (SI2; Figure 058 Figure 058) .

The presence of both forest and open landcovers in the landscape (SI3) is perhaps the most important component of painted bunting habitat. We maximized suitability index scores for painted buntings in landscapes containing 50 percent forest and 50 percent open habitats based on unpublished data from Kopachena. Norris and Elder (1982; cited in Lowther and others 1999) observed buntings in landscapes with 20–80 percent forest, and we assumed this represented the minimum amount of forest needed for painted buntings to be present Table 101 (Table 101) .

As an early successional species, the painted bunting occupies habitats containing high small stem densities (SI4). We assumed mean stem density values observed by Kopachena and Crist (6400 stems/ha; 2000b) were characteristic of average habitat suitability (suitability index score = 0.500) and optimal habitat required twice as many stems (table 102). We fit a smoothed logistic function through these data points Figure 059 (Figure 059) to quantify the relationship between small stem density and suitability index scores for painted bunting habitat.

To calculate the suitability index score for sapling and pole successional age class stands, we determined the geometric mean of SI scores for forest structure (SI1 and SI4) and landscape composition (SI2 and SI3) separately and then the geometric mean of these means together.

SISap-pole = ((SI1 * SI4)0.500 * (SI2 * SI3)0.500)0.500

We assumed shrub-seedling successional age class stands were used irrespective of edge or landscape composition. Thus, we calculated the suitability index score as the geometric mean of forest structure attributes alone (SI1 and SI4).

SIShrub = (SI1 * SI4)0.500

The overall suitability index score is the sum of the two age-class specific SIs:

Overall SI = SISap-pole + SIShrub

spacer