Hooded Warbler
Ecoregional Scale Conservation Planning
spacer
 
   


Made possible through a partnership with the National Wetlands Research Center


Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis)
Status:
The Mississippi kite is a Neotropical migrant raptor, restricted to the Coastal Plains as well as the lower Mississippi and Red River valleys. Like many birds of prey, the Mississippi kite exhibited dramatic recoveries over the last 25 years from historical lows in the 1970’s. However, their general scarcity prevents BBS from detecting any statistically significant trends (Sauer and others 2005; Table 005 Table 005) . The species is not a Bird of Conservation Concern in either the CH or WGCP Table 001 (Table 001) . The Mississippi kite has a regional combined score of 14 in the CH and 16 in the WGCP.
miki
Relative abundance of Mississippi Kite, derived from Breeding Bird Survey data, 1994 - 2003.
 
image courtesy of www.whatbird.com
 

Natural History:
The Mississippi kite demonstrates two different breeding strategies within its range. In the southern Great Plains, Mississippi kites are colonial nesters that often inhabit urban areas. In the Mississippi Valley and further east, they are less colonial and nest singly in large trees in bottomland forest and riparian woodlands. Nests from birds within the eastern population are generally located in large (>22 ha) unfragmented forest near open habitats where birds aerially forage (Parker 1999).

Model Description:

The Mississippi kite habitat suitability model contains six parameters:

  • landform
  • land cover
  • successional age class
  • forest patch size
  • interspersion of forest and open habitats
  • dominant tree density

The first suitability function combines landform, landcover, and successional age class into a single matrix (SI1) defining unique combinations of these classes Table 083 (Table 083) . We directly assigned suitability index scores to these combinations based on relative habitat quality ranks reported by Hamel (1992) for this species. However, we restricted the species to sawtimber stands based on the preference of Mississippi kites for mature forest stands (Parker 1999).

We also included forest patch size (SI2) in the habitat model and used data from Barber and others (1998) to estimate the influence of forest patch size on suitability scores Table 084 (Table 084 ; Figure 049 Figure 049) .

Mississippi kites require not only large patches of forest and grassland, but also need to have these patches in a proper landscape context. We used the relative amount of these habitats within a 1-km radius as an index to their interspersion at the landscape scale (SI3). We assumed birds reached highest densities in either open habitats with few trees (characteristic of the Great Plains population) or landscapes containing moderate forest cover interspersed with open habitats Table 085 (Table 085) .

Mississippi kites nest in dominant trees (SI4) that extend above the canopy. We assumed a tree with a d.b.h. >76.2 cm (30”) in a sawtimber stand would extend above the canopy and provide adequate nest substrate for this species. We further assumed 1 dominant tree/ha would satisfy this requirement and Mississippi kites would be absent from stands with a uniform canopy (i.e., 0 dominant trees/ha). We fit an exponential function Figure 050 (Figure 050) to the values between these data points. Stands with ≥14 dominant trees/ha (the maximum observed in the WGCP during the 1992 FIA survey) were associated with maximum habitat suitability (suitability index score = 1.000; Table 086 Table 086) .

To calculate the overall suitability index score, we determined the geometric mean of SI scores for forest structure (SI1 and SI4) and landscape composition (SI2 and SI3) separately and then the geometric mean of these means together.

Overall SI = ((SI1 * SI4)0.500 * (SI2 * SI3)0.500)0.500

spacer